SportsLook
Salaries & Earnings

College Athlete Pay: $20.5m a School, All Sports

By Khabir Uddin Updated August 29, 2026
A folded white towel and a plain unmarked athletic helmet on a worn wooden bench in an empty locker room, a row of lockers out of focus behind
Image: College athlete pay guide by SportsLook Editorial · Original AI-assisted editorial illustration
On this page6
  1. 01The comparison that frames everything
  2. 02How the new system works
  3. 03NIL did not go away
  4. 04Where this sits in sport’s money
  5. 05What is still unsettled
  6. 06How we checked these numbers

On 6 June 2025, US District Judge Claudia Wilken granted final approval to the $2.8 billion House v. NCAA settlement, and American college sport stopped being amateur.

Schools may now pay athletes directly. The cap is about $20.5 million per school — for every athlete in every sport, combined. Related pay guides are collected in our salaries and earnings hub.

Settlement value$2.8bn
Final approval6 June 2025
Cap, 2025-26~$20.5m per school
Basis~22% of average athletic revenues
Term10 years
Projected 2035 cap~$33m

The comparison that frames everything

Kirby Smart is reported on $13.3 million a year at Georgia, as our guide to the highest paid college football coaches sets out.

A school’s entire revenue-share pool is about $20.5 million.

One coach’s salary is roughly 65% of the total a school may distribute among all of its athletes, across all of its sports.

Extend it across the market: the nine highest-paid coaches earn about $109 million between them, against roughly $184.5 million available to every athlete at those nine schools combined — about 59%.

These are different budget lines, and a coach’s salary does not come out of the athlete pool. That is exactly what makes the comparison informative rather than accusatory: the constraint on athlete compensation is a negotiated cap, and the constraint on coaching pay is the market. Only one of them has a ceiling.

How the new system works

Three features matter, and most coverage collapses them.

It is permitted, not required. Division I schools may share up to the cap. Nothing obliges them to reach it.

Each school decides its own distribution. How the pool is split between football, basketball and every other programme is a school-level decision, not a formula.

The cap moves. It is set at roughly 22% of average athletic revenues, projected to rise about 4% annually for the next two years, and recalculated periodically across the ten-year term — reaching an estimated $33 million by 2035.

NIL did not go away

The most common misunderstanding is that revenue sharing replaced NIL. It did not.

Paid byCounts against cap?
Revenue shareThe schoolYes
NILThird partiesNo

Legitimate third-party NIL payments do not count toward a school’s cap, and are reviewed by an independent clearing house against fair market value rules.

That clearing house is the whole system’s load-bearing element. Without it, NIL would be an unlimited channel around a capped one, and the cap would mean nothing. With it, the question becomes who decides what a deal is genuinely worth — which is where the next decade of disputes will sit.

A College Sports Commission has been established to administer the new arrangements.

Where this sits in sport’s money

College athletics now occupies an unusual position: an enormous revenue business whose labour costs are capped by settlement rather than by a collective bargaining agreement.

One school’s athlete pool~$20.5m
One top coach’s salary$13.3m
Champions League participation fee, per club€18.62m
WNBA maximum player salary$1.4m

A single school may distribute roughly what a Champions League club receives for reaching the league phase. It is a professional-scale sum, arriving in an institution that spent a century insisting the athletes could not be paid at all.

The transparency point from our coaching salaries coverage applies here too: because most of these schools are public universities, far more of this is on the record than in professional sport, where boxing purses are filed in part and manager pay is never disclosed at all.

What is still unsettled

Athletes are not employees under the settlement, and that classification question has not gone away.

The clearing house’s fair-market-value judgements are new and untested at scale. The cap’s ten-year path assumes revenue growth that may not arrive evenly. And further litigation over how the settlement interacts with NIL spending is live.

This is the first year of a ten-year arrangement, not a settled system.

How we checked these numbers

The $2.8 billion settlement value, Judge Claudia Wilken’s final approval on 6 June 2025 and the opening of direct revenue sharing are from CBS Sports and Stone Pigman. The approximately $20.5 million cap for 2025-26, its basis at 22% of average athletic revenues, the projected 4% annual increases, periodic recalculation across the ten-year term and the estimated $33 million by 2035 are from Clemson Athletics’ settlement FAQ and California Sports Law’s explainer. The permissive rather than mandatory nature of revenue sharing, school-level distribution discretion, the coexistence of NIL with revenue sharing, the exclusion of third-party NIL from the cap and the independent clearing house are from the same sources, with the College Sports Commission and the end of amateurism from Jackson Lewis.

The 65% and 59% comparisons are our own arithmetic, using coaching salaries from our own reporting against the published cap. They compare separate budget lines and are offered as a measure of scale, not as a claim that one is funded from the other.

Review class: annual, event-driven. Recheck on each cap recalculation, any clearing house rule change, and on further litigation affecting the settlement.

Share this article

Frequently asked questions

How much can a college school pay its athletes?+

About $20.5 million for 2025-26, across all sports and all athletes combined. The figure represents roughly 22% of a school's average athletic revenues, is recalculated periodically, and is projected to reach around $33 million by 2035.

What is the House settlement?+

The $2.8 billion settlement of House v. NCAA, an antitrust case over NCAA rules that barred schools from paying athletes directly. US District Judge Claudia Wilken granted final approval on 6 June 2025, allowing direct revenue sharing to begin in 2025-26 for a ten-year term.

Is revenue sharing the same as NIL?+

No. Revenue sharing is money paid by a school to its own athletes under the cap. NIL is payment from third parties for name, image and likeness rights. They exist alongside each other, and legitimate third-party NIL payments do not count against the school's cap.

Do all schools have to pay athletes?+

No. Division I schools are permitted to share revenue up to the cap, not required to. Each school also decides for itself how to distribute whatever it shares between its sports and its athletes.

Who checks NIL deals now?+

An independent clearing house reviews third-party NIL payments for compliance with fair market value rules. It exists to stop NIL being used as an unlimited route around the revenue-share cap.

How does athlete pay compare with coaching salaries?+

A school's entire revenue-share pool of about $20.5 million covers every athlete in every sport. Kirby Smart alone is reported on $13.3 million a year at Georgia — around 65% of one school's whole athlete pool, paid to one person from a separate budget line.

Is NCAA amateurism over?+

In the form it existed for a century, yes. Schools may now compensate athletes directly, and a College Sports Commission has been established to administer the new arrangements. Athletes are still not classified as employees under the settlement.

Sources

Related salaries & earnings guides

View all →